I have a problem with this one news story today. It talks about a caricature published in European newspapers and publications. It supposedly makes fun of Muhammad, the Islamic prophet. What I want to know is why militants think they have the right to promise kidnappings. Here in America, people make fun of Christ all the time and denounce his presence in all public places. Now, you f****n Islamic pricks, buck up and knock off the crap. Your extremis brothers and sisters is the cause for the hatred of Islam, so maybe you want to talk to them first. IF Islam is really a religion of peace, then take out those who say it is otherwise. Now, people in your Arab/Islamic world don't seem to understand. You depict western civilization as evil and tyranical, but get pissed off when one little f****n caricature is drawn. People denounce Christ in America all the time, but you don't see militants promising kidnappings to atheists do you. No. So my final point. Shut the hell up and get over yourselves. Maybe if you would stop the extremists in your world, people wouldn't hate Islam so much. Spend time thinking about that rather than worrying about some dumb cartoon!

God Bless America and God Bless the bastards who don't know any better.

TO SEE THE ARTICLE, VISIT IT AT FOXNEWS.COM HERE.

It's been quite some time since I wrote. However, I received this e-mail from a KUCR colleague of mine. The subject line is that "liberals are catching on." It couldn't be more true. Check out what is going down at KU; it seems like an all-out political blitz is in the brewing, something that I am really excited for:

Greg Hafer writes: Hi! I’m Greg Hafer and I have some troubling news. A group of KU liberals tried to start a paper called the Kutztown Katalyst. Things didn’t work out so well because of the bureaucracy of the school and things like that. However, as conservatives are starting to take over our campus with there smarmy conservative talk shows and their dominance over our school news paper, they are trying to take it one step further and come out with their own paper similar to our Kutztown Katalyst. They are calling it The Bottom Line. I’ve been taking some strides to take back our school by starting a liberal talk show, which starts next semester. I’ve also teamed up with Bob Flately, some crazy dude that works in the library on their databases, and we are going to join a branch of the Sierra Club called the Sierra Student Coalition by starting a group on campus. Please keep an eye out for flyers on how you can get involved. Also, my radio show is going to have a crack team called the Truth Squad that will be doing some field work for the show. Please message me if you are interested. Below I have posted the message that came across from the “George Bush is our president” group. Their lie machine is revving to go and these snobby conservatives have the money to pay for its gas.

Their newspaper probably didn't succeed just as our Bottom Line didn't last semester. The problem is, the University will not help in political publications because of the beaurocracy, as correctly stated by Greg. Now, what we decided to do is something that is not foreign to this type of problem: privatize. We are going about it with our own money and our own fundraising. If they (liberals) wouldn't play the victim so many times, they would be able to easily set up their Katalyst. No, what do they do? they whine about it and claim that they aren't being treated fairly. Yes it is fair, we couldn't do it either with University funds, and neither can they. We are smarter and found other ways to do it. Privatize "as a student entrepreneurial project" as fellow member Paul King said, and the University can't touch it. The only exception is if it purposely degrades the University. This coming from a guy that superimposed his face onto Christ's and places it as his facebook.com profile pic. Once again, Liberals don't seem to get it, but at the same time, the Conservatives are making noise.

Bring on the Libs! God Bless America, God Bless our University, and God Bless those who don't know any better.

A few stories to kick things off:

First, Hilary Clinton and Harry Reid are caught with Abramoff  cash. However, a majority of Democrats and Liberals call it a "Republican problem," to quote Reid. Reid has refused to give back the money. Check out Reid's article, in paragraph 17 (on page two)

Here's the article about Hilary (SEE HERE) and the one for Reid (SEE HERE)

Another gripe I have is the media. The liberal-biased media. There was a terror plot against the United States that was foiled in large part because the NSA program Bush authorized helped foil it. Now, with the NSA program. People who don't like it are people who have something to hide. Honestly, Americans have to buck up a little. Personally if someone listens to anything I talk about, I don't care. THe only problem is that these tapes are NOT someone listening with earphones. Almost all of them are conducted by high-tech survailence equipment that monitors patterns BETWEEN SUSPECTED TERRORISTS. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WILL NOT WASTE VALUABLE TIME LISTENING TO A FOURTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL TALKING ABOUT HER CRUSH, WHICH IS WHAT LIBERALS WANT YOU TO THINK. But no, Americans are too damn stupid. Here's the article about the terror plot (SEE HERE.)

There was a thought of voter fraud in the 2004 election, but as I have pointed out in the past (not on this xanga site, on past blogs), members of Kerry's campaign are now set for trial for slashing tires to Republican vehicles to transport immobile voters to polling places, wiping out nearly 25% of the fleet. Here's the story:

Kerry Workers' Tire-Slashing Trial Begins

Fourteen months after John Kerry narrowly carried Wisconsin in the 2004 presidential election amidst allegations of voter fraud, five campaign workers for the Kerry-Edwards campaign team are set for trial Tuesday in Milwaukee on felony charges of damage to property.

The "Milwaukee Five" is charged with slashing 40 tires on 25 separate Republican vehicles on the morning of the 2004 presidential election. The vehicles were rented by the Wisconsin Republican Party to transport less-mobile voters to the polls on Election Day. In total, the vandals disabled 25 percent of the Republican Party's "Get Out the Vote" fleet.

The defendants include Sowande Ajumoke Omokunde, the son of Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wisc.) who also goes by the name Supreme Solar Allah; Michael Pratt, the son of former Milwaukee Mayor Marvin Pratt and leader of Kerry's campaign team in Milwaukee; Lewis Caldwell; Lavelle Mohammed, and Justin Howell.

According to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, four of the defendants were paid operatives of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, including Omokunde and Pratt.

Court TV will cover the trial, which is expected to last two weeks. Potential witnesses include Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), national AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, and 77 others - including FBI agents, Milwaukee police officers, and party activists from both parties.

The five defendants, who will be tried together, are charged with criminal damage to property, a felony with maximum sentences of 3 1/2 years in prison or $10,000 in fines.

The criminal complaint states that Opel Simmons, a Democratic campaign worker from Virginia, identified the defendants as the perpetrators, and told police they had named their plan "Operation Elephant Takeover."

Simmons told Milwaukee County Assistant District Attorney David Feiss that he saw the defendants dressed in "Mission Impossible type gear" at Democratic Party headquarters sometime around 3 a.m. on the morning of the election.

When Simmons asked the five what they were planning, defendant Lavelle Mohammed allegedly responded, "You don't want to know, don't ask.?

The defendants returned to Democratic headquarters approximately 20 minutes later. Simmons told investigators they were jubilant and shared details of their vandalism spree with him. "We got 'em," said Pratt. "We hit the tires."

The tire-slashing incident is just one of a number of election-day irregularities in Wisconsin, a state where Kerry only prevailed by 11,384 votes.

Questions have been raised about the inordinately large volume of Election Day registrations in Milwaukee, where 84,000 people in a city of 600,000 registered at the polls on the day of the election. The total represented 30 percent of all voters in the city.

Milwaukee city officials admitted in January 2005 that around 10,000 same-day registrations could not be verified, leaving open the possibility of fraud.

An investigation by the Milwaukee-Journal Sentinel reported another 1,200 Milwaukeeans voted using invalid addresses. Another article revealed in late January 2005 that there were 7,000 more votes than voters in Milwaukee, suggesting ballot-stuffing in the Democrat-controlled city.

Next, I wonder why pDemocrats keep saying the economy isn't so hot and it's George Bush's excuse to try and boost approval ratings. It's more robust than in the Clinton administration, but it is not reported as so. Here's a story from MoneyNews:

Media Downplaying U.S. Economic Success?

Last week MoneyNews pointed out that ever since the Democrats ceded power, there has been a marked difference in mainstream media coverage of economic news involving President Bush and the Republican congressional majority.

In case you missed it, we provided an example: A recent Associated Press report implied that France's anemic 0.7% third-quarter growth was bullish - while the same article greeted the U.S. economy's 3.5% growth for the same period with caveats and skepticism.

Now The Washington Post has published a questionable article - this time about the U.S. unemployment picture.

The Post dismissed last week's 4.9% unemployment rate as a weak number. But nine years ago, when President Clinton occupied the White House, The Post and the rest of old media were gleefully reporting that the 5.4% unemployment under President Clinton was evidence of a rosy economy and the administration's solid policies.

Take a look The Post's coverage of the jobless figure cited in mid-1996:

"The unemployment rate dropped to 5.4%, its lowest level in 14 months, the government reported yesterday, capping a week of good economic news for the country - and great news for President Clinton's reelection bid," read The Post.

"Wages are rising at their fastest pace in five years, consumer confidence is soaring and business and consumer spending has fueled an unexpectedly strong burst of economic growth. This rosy outlook could rob Senate Majority Leader Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.), Clinton's likely Republican rival for the presidency, of a critical campaign issue."

Buried deep in this story was the fact that the American economy only added 2,000 jobs that month - a truly anemic figure, especially compared to the 108,000 jobs added to the U.S. economy in 2006. But The Post seemed to embrace this lackluster number as good news.

"Moreover, only 2,000 jobs were added to employers' payrolls last month, while those in construction and manufacturing combined fell by 70,000," The Post reported.

"Usually such a tiny gain in payrolls might have raised fears that economic growth was faltering. But in this case, payrolls had gone up an average of 221,000 a month in the first quarter, and a number of analysts said last month's flat number only lessened their concern that the economy might be growing so fast that inflation would worsen."

Now compare that to the Post's Jan. 7, 2006, coverage of the U.S. jobless rate for November 2005, which dropped to 4.9%.

The Post barely acknowledges President Bush's success.

"The figures offered a well-timed boost to President Bush, who touted them here in his latest outing in a campaign to convince Americans that his tax and budget policies are working, despite polling that shows widespread unease about the economy," says The Post.

"Congressional Democrats said the unease is justified, noting that job growth in December was slower than many economists expected and citing Labor Department data showing that, for the average worker, prices are rising faster than wages."

So a 4.9 jobless rate under President Bush fuels "unease" among Americans while a 5.4% rate under President Clinton was "great news."

Biased media? What biased media?

GOD BLESS AMERICA, HER TROOPS, AND THE IDIOTS THAT DON'T HAVE ANY COMMON SENSE TO KNOW ANY BETTER

I'm making this short because I have no energy left in me from today. BUT, there is an article about how two girls are being expelled in California for being suspected lesbians. Now, the girls are sueing for discrimination and, put in a nutshell, defamation. My problem is this, it's a LUTHERAN PRIVATE school and the lawyer says this:

Hanson [the girls' attorney] said the 142-student school in Wildomar, Calif., must comply with state civil rights laws because it functions as a business by collecting tuition.

A. The principal said they are bein expelled for "Such a relationship violates our Christian Code of Conduct."  If I remember correctly, private schools are allowed to filter through who they allow into their schools.  B. Conducting yourself as a business because of tuition. Private schools are not businesses because of tuition. They are run based on tuition payments. Those paymentsgo to electric and public utility bills, as well as teacher salary and invested right back into the school's educational curriculum. I believe the phrase is NOT-FOR-PROFIT?

Now, this lawsuit would only happen in such a state as California (and possibly Massachusetts), where you can't even run a private institution. There is not neccessarily any discrimination going on. It is something that, according to their religious code, is unacceptable. Go to public school? Find a differeny private school.

Once again, I am reminded of the Liberal idiocy across this nation where they have the thought that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to whoever you want. If it is found to be wrong by the law, you can get an attorney to weasel your way out of it (some times, not always does this work.) Which will be a later piece on here: Lawyers; Where Liberty and Justice is NOT for All.

GOD BLESS AMERICA, GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS, GOD BLESS THE IDIOTS THAT DON'T KNOW ANY DIFFERENT, AND SO HELP US GOD IF WE FAIL TO DO YOUR WORK.

I have a bone to pick with someone. Dr. Maulana Karenga. Many of you probably don't know who this person is. But I saw on Channel 6 ABC a message of "HAPPY KWANZAA." First of all, this is a made-up holiday that undermines all other religious beliefs. Second of all, where do you come off, ABC (a Philadelphia station, go figure for Kwanzaa) to say Happy Kwanzaa, but not Merry Christmas? Or even for the Jewish faith, Happy Hanukkah. This troubles me to the deepest extent. Everyone is calling for the First Amendment. The freedom of religion. Not having to have an ESTABLISHED RELIGION BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. Yet, you can't ever say Merry Christmas. Or mention God. But, something unreligious, supposedly, as Kwanzaa is alright. Who cares anyway, it's an illegitimate holiday based on nothing. You can visit the site HERE if you'd like. It was founded in 1966 during the black freedom movement. Hmm, founded in America. But, it's supposed to be celebrated around the world. Not too many people I have heard of celebrate it anywhere but the United States. If I may be perfectly frank with anyone who is reading this, I believe it is an attempt, once again, by the black (or to be politically correct African-American) community to make it seem that their struggles continue today because of the white men (or to be politically correct, Caucasian.)

In my desire to give my thoughts on welfare and the state of minorities in America, I will take this time to finally write my theory on the welfare system, and why minorities seem to have "less priviledges" than other Americans, notably the Irish, Italian, and other Caucasian immigrants. Here is the theory:

The Civil War ended in 1868 when the Confederate States of America surrendered. At this time, minorities (which was basically blacks or African-Americans) were the poor of America (alongside some poor and illiterate whites.) As the country moved forward into the 20th Century, they (blacks) were left with almost nothing, except those who were treated well by their "masters." Now, between then and the Great Society and government aid programs LBJ created, it seems that it is still stuck in the minority culture (for the most part) that welfare is the way to go. Look at most urban areas, most are a national minority and are "under-priviledged." However, no one purposely denies jobs or education to anyone (with the exception of some corrupt businessmen who should be jailed for their actions.) You say that the children cant get as good of schooling because of the parents' jobs. But look at when the parents were children. What were their parents doing? Low-income jobs only. It is a pattern that goes back to the age of slavery. This day in age, it isn't because America thinks less of minorities, it's because for a large portion of minorities, that's all they know. It's not something they like to do, but for many minority families, this generation of children is the first to go to college. Why? Because of the slave trade. I will not leap through hurdles to "make ammends" for what happened in the past, but all the welfare programs and crap has never helped minorities break through. Yes, one can say that other immigrant groups have started from nothing as well, but they didn't have the oppression of slavery from their roots. I also know that not all blacks are African-Americans with slavery roots. Those typically are the families who are better off than their fellow brothers and sisters in God. Now, welfare is an excuse not to try and find work. Millions of jobs are created each year, yet minorities aren't the majority filling them. Why? Because it's still stuck in their culture. But, at the same token, minorities tend to use it as an excuse. I think everyone should work their tails off and try to better themselves. Blacks, whites, brown, red, yellow, green. Whatever ethnicity and whatever background. Work for yourself. Work to make your life its fullest. Don't rely on everyone else.

As for businessmen and those who hire employees, hire for merit. Hire because someone deserves it. Not because of color. That is another subject: affirmative action. That does no one any good. People get positions who dont deserve them and people get cheated out of positions who do deserve them and people who get positions that don't have the skills neccessary can't perform well because they are pushed through the system. This goes back to my original thought: work hard for yourself, and make a name for yourself based on merit. Don't rely on other people to hand you something. Which is why I will never rely on SS money. I am 18 and as far back as 16 i have put a certain amount of money aside so I don't have to worry about it. It jsut pisses me off that I am losing money to SS tax and will never see it again, unless SS reform takes place. But that is a differnt subject as previously noted.

God Bless America, God Bless Her troops, and God Bless the American Idiot who doesn't know any better.